Border Governors' Conference

Back to home page
Home

XIX Agriculture Working Table

2000 BGC ACCOMPLISHMENTS 

Executive Summary
from June 2000 – June 2001
Presented at the XIX Border Governors Conference United States – Mexico

Tampico, Tamaulipas

 

AGRICULTURE

 

REQUEST THAT THE FEDERAL AND STATE INSPECTION AGENCIES AT THE PORTS OF ENTRY ALONG THE U. S. – MEXICO BORDER WORK TO HARMONIZE AND MAINTAIN A CONSISTENT INSPECTION PROCESS, IDENTIFYING DISCREPANCIES IN CURRENT PROCEDURES AND PROMOTING OUTREACH, IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SMOOTH INTERCHANGE OF BI-NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS.

 

  • The Secretaries of Agriculture from the ten border states sent a letter to the United States and Mexican Secretaries of Agriculture requesting the establishment of an improved inspection process.
  • The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) recently approved a grant for eight additional inspectors from Mexico to travel to the U.S. for another inspector exchange to work with inspectors in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California. This exchange will occur in late summer.

 

PROMOTE PLANT AND ANIMAL HEALTH, PHYTOSANITARY/SANITARY AND FOOD SAFETY PRACTICES, AS WELL AS QUALITY ASSURANCE MEASURES THAT ENSURE THE WELL-BEING OF CONSUMERS IN BOTH COUNTRIES, BY ENCOURAGING STATE AGRICULTURAL AGENCIES TO ENHANCE COOPERATION IN THEIR COLLECTIVE EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH AND INFORMATION DISSEMINATION TO PRIVATE INDUSTRY.

 

  • Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, Tamaulipas and Texas jointly developed a regional work plan to eradicate the Mexican fruit fly. Texas continues to work with the three Mexican border states on this process and has held several teleconferences and meetings on the topic with its Mexican counterparts.
  • California conducted regular cooperative meetings with Baja California, including the establishment of a sterile fruit fly release facility in Tijuana and a fruit fly eradication program.

 

ENCOURAGE THE CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF BI-NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND ACADEMIC EXCHANGE PROGRAMS INTENDED TO ADDRESS RAPIDLY CHANGING ENVIRONMENT AND CROSS-BORDER MARKETING NEEDS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS IN BOTH COUNTRIES.

 

  • A pesticide inspector exchange program occurred. The Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Desarrollo Rural (SAGAR) selected eight inspectors from Mexico to travel to Texas, Arizona and California to work with inspectors from these states in August 2000. Five of the U.S. host inspectors then traveled to Michoacán, Guanajuato and Mexico City in October 2000 to see how inspections are performed.
  • Texas has shared information with each of its four counterparts in Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo Leon and Tamaulipas on weather modification programs.

 

 

BORDER CROSSINGS

 

REQUEST THAT BOTH FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION TO IMPLEMENT THE ORIGINAL TRUCKING REGULATION PROVISIONS, INCLUDING PHASING, OF NAFTA WHICH ALLOW FOR BOTH U. S. AND MEXICAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANIES TO OPERATE FREELY WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE BORDER STATES.

 

  • The U.S. border states participated in conference calls with the U.S. Trade Representative regarding NAFTA trucking issues.

 

OPPOSE ANY EXIT CONTROL SYSTEM AT BORDER PORTS OF ENTRY THAT NEGATIVELY IMPACTS TRADE, TOURISM OR OTHER LEGITIMATE CROSS-BORDER TRAFFIC, AND RECOMMEND THAT SECTION 110 BE AMENDED IN FAVOR OF A MORE TRADE-EFFICIENT AND BORDER-FRIENDLY ALTERNATIVE.

 

  • The four U. S. border states are working with General Services Administration (GSA) and the Federal Inspection Services (FIS) to address the federal agencies’ concerns on this issue. The Mexican border states are supporting this effort.

 

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

 

EXPAND AND PROMOTE THE BORDER STATES’ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WEB PAGE, WHICH OFFERS INFORMATION ABOUT INDUSTRIAL CLUSTERS, DIRECTORIES OF THE PRINCIPAL COMPANIES IN THE REGION, AS WELL AS A CALENDAR OF THE MOST IMPORTANT LOCAL, REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE SHOWS.

 

  • A specific website (http://www.tded.state.tx.us/borderinitiatives/eco-dev/) is dedicated to the achievements and accomplishments of the economic development working table, providing its visitors with the most current information concerning the Border Governors Conference. Participating states share the responsibility of maintaining and hosting the site.

 

PROMOTE THE PARTICIPATION OF ENTREPRENEURS TO THE REGION’S MOST IMPORTANT TRADE SHOWS, WHICH HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED, BASED ON THE STRENGTHS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF EACH STATE OR SUB-REGION, THUS CONTRIBUTING TO A MORE EFFECTIVE REGIONAL INTEGRATION.

 

  • All states have identified their most important trade shows and those that they will attend, sharing this information with the other states. Promotion for entrepreneurial participation has taken place in each state at both, local and regional levels through the economic development working table.

 

EDUCATION

 

STRENGTHEN AND PROMOTE SUCCESSFUL TECHNICAL TRAINING AND WORK FORCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS TO ENHANCE THE WELFARE AND PROSPERITY OF THE ECONOMIES AND RESIDENTS OF OUR REGION.

 

  • California, through the San Diego Community College District and the community college based Centers for International Trade and Development (programs focused on trade with Mexico), has promoted both technical training and high-demand skill area development in partnership with Mexican training institutions.

 

PROMOTE EDUCATIONAL LANGUAGE PROGRAMS THAT ENCOURAGE THE EFFICACY AND FLUENCY OF ENGLISH AND SPANISH.

 

  • Nuevo Leon has signed agreements with the Austin Community College system to exchange teachers. Also participating in educational language programs are the Van Beaurue Technology Center and the University of Texas at Corpus Christi.

 

REVITALIZE THE EDUCATIONAL STRUCTURES AND PROGRAMS IN THE BORDER STATES TO EXPAND, COORDINATE AND CONSOLIDATE ACADEMIC, TECHNICAL, CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL EXCHANGES.

 

  • Through the Education Institute Sonora–Arizona, Sonora has strengthened its programs with the goal of increasing, coordinating and consolidating academic, technical and cultural exchanges between Sonora and Arizona.

 

ENVIRONMENT

 

REQUEST THAT THE CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES RESTORE THE BUDGET FOR THE BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUND (BEIF) TO AT LEAST $100 MILLION PER YEAR, AS PROJECTED BY THE NORTH AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK’S (NADBANK) TEN-YEAR NEEDS ASSESSMENT, IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE SUBSTANTIAL DEFICIENCIES IN THE BORDER REGION AND RECOGNIZING THE PROGRESS ACHIEVED WITH THESE FUNDS IN PREVIOUS YEARS.

 

  • Border state officials traveled with NADBank staff to Washington, D.C. in the spring of 2000 to remind congressional staff and border congressional representatives of the importance of the Border Environment Infrastructure Funds (BEIF) monies for border environmental infrastructure. The EPA Border Fund under the VA-HUD Appropriations Bill was increased to $75 million for fiscal year 2000. This was a $25 million increase over last year’s appropriations.

 

REQUEST THAT BOTH FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS INFORM RESPECTIVE STATES IN WRITING ABOUT PROPOSED PROJECTS WITH POTENTIAL TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, AND ACT IMMEDIATELY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT, RECOGNIZING THAT THE BORDER STATES WILL COORDINATE AND NOTIFY ALL AFFECTED STATES.

 

  • The U.S. EPA is coordinating with the U.S. border states in the development of an agreement for transboundary notification. The State of Chihuahua has been working with SEMARNAT on an agreement that would facilitate the notification of federal projects that may have an impact on the environment in the State of Arizona.

 

PROTECT SHARED WATER RESOURCES IN THE BORDER REGION BY ENCOURAGING APPROPRIATE STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO PROMOTE CONSERVATION POLICIES FOR ALL WATER USE SECTORS.

 

  • A joint declaration has been executed between the California Environmental Protection Agency (CALEPA) and Mexico’s Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT) to carry out joint activities for the conservation and sustainable development of the Sea of Cortez region.

 

  • Technical assistance on the development and implementation of industrial wastewater monitoring and pretreatment programs has been provided to interested Mexican states by their counterpart U.S. states.

 

REQUEST THAT MEXICO’S SECRETARIAT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES AND FISHERIES (SEMARNAP) AND THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (USEPA), DEVELOP A BINATIONAL PROGRAM WITH STATE INPUT FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND HANDLING AND MANAGEMENT OF PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES USED IN AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK INDUSTRIES IN ORDER TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH.

 

  • All ten U.S.-Mexico border states have been working with the environmental federal agencies to develop the next phase of the binational environmental program. The emphasis is to create a plan that has a flexible structure that focuses on regional priorities as well as expanding the involvement of local municipalities and interested parties.

 

REQUEST THAT EACH FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCREASE THE APPROPRIATION FROM $1.6 MILLION TO AT LEAST $2 MILLION FROM EACH COUNTRY TO THE BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION COMMISSION (BECC), THROUGH MEXICO’S SECRETARIAT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES AND FISHERIES (SEMARNAP) AND THE U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT, TO IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY OF THE PROJECT APPROVAL PROCESS, INCLUDING REEVALUATION OF CRITERIA AND CERTIFICATION OF PROJECTS PROPOSED BY THE PRIVATE SECTOR.

 

  • A joint communiqué addressed to responsible federal governmental authorities requesting an increase to the BECC budget has been drafted.

 

REQUEST THAT THE NORTH AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (NADBANK) AND THE BORDER ENVIRONMENT COOPERATION COMMISSION (BECC) INCLUDE A STATE REPRESENTATIVE FROM EACH COUNTRY ON THE U.S.-MEXICO INFRASTRUCTURE COORDINATION COMMITTEE IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE STATE INTERESTS.

 

  • A joint communiqué to NADBank requesting a seat for a state representative from each country on the infrastructure coordination committee has been drafted. The ten border states requested in writing, and received approval for a state representative of each country to participate in the Infrastructure Committee of the Border Environment Cooperation Commission.

 

TOURISM

 

INCLUDE WITHIN THE ANNUAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMS OF THE STATE TOURISM OFFICES, AS WELL AS WITHIN NATIONAL TOURISM PROGRAMS, PROMOTION OF BORDER CULTURAL HERITAGE, HISTORIC CORRIDORS AND ECOTOURISM, TAKING ADVANTAGE THE NATURAL SCENIC DIVERSITY IN THE BORDER REGION.

 

  • Arizona and Sonora established Arizona-Sonora Real Estate Task Force to promote the development in Sonora of real estate practices that will protect buyers and help the area’s beach resorts realize their development potential.

 

 

JOINTLY DEVELOP EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS THAT INFORM AND ASSIST POTENTIAL TRAVELERS TO THE BORDER REGION REGARDING RULES AND LAWS ABOUT TRANSPORTING VEHICLES AND FIREARMS, INSURANCE COVERAGE AND IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS PROCEDURES.

 

  • Texas met with the Federal Border Tourism Director for SECTUR to discuss possible solutions to educate the traveler on the rules and regulations pertaining to this recommendation. Also discussed was the possibility of organizing educational seminars promoted by product to target each border area.

 

JOINTLY WORK TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT A MECHANISM TO CONSISTENTLY AND ACCURATELY COLLECT INFORMATION REGARDING THE VOLUME OF CROSS-BORDER TRAVEL AND TRAVELERS, TO GAIN COMPARABLE DATA TO MEASURE THE IMPORTANCE OF BORDER TOURISM.

 

  • Sonora created a software program that is being updated on an ongoing basis with information from all ten border states, in order to have precise data on the volume of border crossing travelers.

Baja California completed the Study of Incoming Tourists for the State of Baja California, elaborated by the government of the State of Baja California for distribution to the governments of border-states.

 

 

Agriculture
Border Crossings
Economic Development
Education
Environment
Tourism

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


top of page

© Copyright 2005 Texas Department of Agriculture.
 All Rights Reserved.
contact@agr.state.tx.us